As some of you know, I’ve been fangirling hard over the new Tomb Raider , the first entry in the video game series since 2008, and ostensibly a reboot for the entire franchise . Taking the form of an origin story, Tomb Raider 2013 depicts the events that transformed a beautiful, if bookish, archaeology graduate into a pistol-packing adventurer with a devil-may-care attitude. We meet Lara Croft as a pretty, fairly ordinary 21 year old, brooding over her work notes, listening to her mp3 player and very much confined to the shadow of her male mentors. By the end of the game, however, she’s taken charge – she’s had to! – and, battered, bruised and bloody, she’s both a survivor and hero, right down to rescuing the princess and carrying her away in her arms. Yeah, this is probably the best point to mention that there will be some Tomb Raider 2013 spoilers in this post, so read ahead with caution. Anyway, I loved the game. Technically it’s near faultless, it looks beautiful, the ov
Comments
There's a Notre Dame football reference buried in the movie. It's the game the driver is listening to in the parking garage. While it's cool, the fact that they're playing Southern California on Christmas Eve is a little...wrong.
Despite this, I loves me some Die Hard.
AND, I think I just figured out what my in-laws can get me for Christmas. Aside from a bunch of shirts that I'll never wear.
Curiously, in doing some research for this movie calendar, I discovered that that other great 80s action flick, Lethal Weapon 1, was also set around Christmas. A strange coincidence.
But then, the second movie didn't have Alan Rickman in it. Now I'm torn.
I own the fourth. I haven't watched it yet (I bought the unedited cut).
I really enjoyed Die Hard 4.0; certainly more than 3.